Objective: To evaluate the healthcare and societal
economic burden of adjunctively-treated patients with
uncontrolled epilepsy.
Methods: A retrospective claims database (representative
of the commercially insured US population) was used to
analyze direct and indirect costs (Jan-2006 to Dec-2011) for
patients with epilepsy. Patients had ≥1 diagnosis code for
epilepsy (ICD-9 345.xx), ≥18 years of age, and had
received ≥1 add-on Anti Epileptic Drug (AED) within 60
days of first-line treatment. Patients were grouped into:
Well-controlled (no change in AED and no epilepsy-related
Emergency Room (ER) or inpatient visits), Uncontrolled
(≥2 AED changes in ≥30 days and ≥1 Epilepsy-Related ER
or inpatient visits), and Intermediate-controlled (not
grouped as Uncontrolled or Well-controlled). The groups
were matched based on propensity scoring in a 1:1:1 ratio
including age, sex, and Charlson comorbidities index score.
A mixed-effects model was used to calculate the adjusted
cost differences.
Results: From 141,173 patients, 6,785 triads were included
in the analysis. Mean age was 48±16.6 years (62% female).
Uncontrolled patients had significantly higher direct costs:
Uncontrolled vs. Well-controlled: $32,077; Uncontrolled
vs. Intermediate-controlled: $14,855. Indirect costs were:
Uncontrolled vs. Well-controlled: $5,016; Uncontrolled vs.
Intermediate-controlled: $2,750. Differences were due to
hospitalization costs (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled: $15,297; Uncontrolled/Intermediated-controlled: $9,123),
outpatient visits (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled: $9,248;
Uncontrolled/Intermediated-controlled: $4,534), AED costs
(Uncontrolled/Well-controlled:
$4,546;
Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled: $3,079), sick leave
costs
(Uncontrolled/Well-controlled:
$4,849;
Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled: $2,577), and total
work
loss
(Uncontrolled/Well-controlled:
Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled:
$2,750)
$5,016;
(all
p<0.01).Adjusted costs were significantly higher for
Intermediate-control vs. Well-controlled patients for all
cost items (all p<0.01), with the exception of non-AED
costs and disability, which were not significantly different.
Conclusions: In this study, direct and indirect costs were
highest for uncontrolled, and lowest for well-controlled
epilepsy. These findings suggest the importance of
improvements in control of seizure activity (either from
uncontrolled
to
intermediate-controlled,
or
from
intermediate-controlled to well-controlled), both from a
societal cost and public health perspective.
Open Access
Peer Reviewed
ISSN: 2378-8933
Neurological Research and Therapy
International open-access publishing for high-quality research, reviews, case studies, and scholarly communication.
Submit Manuscript
Original Research
Article in Press
Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Uncontrolled Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study in a Commercially-Insured U.S. Population
Fulton Velez*1, Vamsi Bollu1, Thirupathi Pattipaka2 and Maria Malmenäs2
Corresponding Author: Fulton Velez
Received: Oct 24, 2014
Accepted: Nov 28, 2014
Published: Dec 01, 2014
Views: 4
DOI: 10.14437
Abstract
Fulton Velez (2014), Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Uncontrolled Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study in a
Commercially-Insured U.S. Population. Neurol Res Ther Open Access 1:106
Copyright:
Copyright: © 2014 NRTOA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, Version 3.0, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Indexed In
Google Scholar
DOAJ
PubMed
Scopus