Open Access Peer Reviewed ISSN: 2378-8933

Neurological Research and Therapy

International open-access publishing for high-quality research, reviews, case studies, and scholarly communication.

Submit Manuscript
Original Research Article in Press

Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Uncontrolled Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study in a Commercially-Insured U.S. Population

Fulton Velez*1, Vamsi Bollu1, Thirupathi Pattipaka2 and Maria Malmenäs2
Corresponding Author: Fulton Velez
Received: Oct 24, 2014
Accepted: Nov 28, 2014
Published: Dec 01, 2014
Views: 4
DOI: 10.14437

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the healthcare and societal 
economic burden of adjunctively-treated patients with 
uncontrolled epilepsy. 
Methods: A retrospective claims database (representative 
of the commercially insured US population) was used to 
analyze direct and indirect costs (Jan-2006 to Dec-2011) for 
patients with epilepsy. Patients had ≥1 diagnosis code for 
epilepsy (ICD-9 345.xx), ≥18 years of age, and had 
received ≥1 add-on Anti Epileptic Drug (AED) within 60 
days of first-line treatment. Patients were grouped into: 
Well-controlled (no change in AED and no epilepsy-related 
Emergency Room (ER) or inpatient visits), Uncontrolled 
(≥2 AED changes in ≥30 days and ≥1 Epilepsy-Related ER 
or inpatient visits), and Intermediate-controlled (not 
grouped as Uncontrolled or Well-controlled). The groups 
were matched based on propensity scoring in a 1:1:1 ratio 
including age, sex, and Charlson comorbidities index score. 
A mixed-effects model was used to calculate the adjusted 
cost differences. 
Results: From 141,173 patients, 6,785 triads were included 
in the analysis. Mean age was 48±16.6 years (62% female). 
Uncontrolled patients had significantly higher direct costs: 
Uncontrolled vs. Well-controlled: $32,077; Uncontrolled 
vs. Intermediate-controlled: $14,855. Indirect costs were: 
Uncontrolled vs. Well-controlled: $5,016; Uncontrolled vs. 
Intermediate-controlled: $2,750. Differences were due to 
hospitalization costs (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled: $15,297; Uncontrolled/Intermediated-controlled: $9,123), 
outpatient visits (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled: $9,248; 
Uncontrolled/Intermediated-controlled: $4,534), AED costs 
(Uncontrolled/Well-controlled:
 $4,546; 
Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled: $3,079), sick leave 
costs
 (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled:
 $4,849; 
Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled: $2,577), and total 
work
 loss
 (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled:
Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled:
 $2,750)
 $5,016; 
 (all 
p<0.01).Adjusted costs were significantly higher for 
Intermediate-control vs. Well-controlled patients for all 
cost items (all p<0.01), with the exception of non-AED 
costs and disability, which were not significantly different. 
Conclusions: In this study, direct and indirect costs were 
highest for uncontrolled, and lowest for well-controlled 
epilepsy. These findings suggest the importance of 
improvements in control of seizure activity (either from 
uncontrolled
 to
 intermediate-controlled,
 or
 from 
intermediate-controlled to well-controlled), both from a 
societal cost and public health perspective. 

Download PDF
Fulton Velez (2014), Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Uncontrolled Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study in a Commercially-Insured U.S. Population. Neurol Res Ther Open Access 1:106
Copyright: Copyright: © 2014 NRTOA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, Version 3.0, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Indexed In
Google Scholar
DOAJ
PubMed
Scopus