Open Access Peer Reviewed ISSN: 2378-8933

Neurological Research and Therapy

International open-access publishing for high-quality research, reviews, case studies, and scholarly communication.

Submit Manuscript
Original Research Vol. 1, Issue 2 (2014)

Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Uncontrolled Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study in a Commercially-Insured U.S. Population

Fulton Velez*1, Vamsi Bollu1, Thirupathi Pattipaka2 and Maria Malmenäs2
Corresponding Author: Fulton Velez
Received: Oct 24, 2014
Accepted: Nov 28, 2014
Published: Dec 01, 2014
Views: 11
DOI: 10.14437

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the healthcare and societal economic burden of adjunctively-treated patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. 

Methods: A retrospective claims database (representative of the commercially insured US population) was used to analyze direct and indirect costs (Jan-2006 to Dec-2011) for patients with epilepsy. Patients had ≥1 diagnosis code for epilepsy (ICD-9 345.xx), ≥18 years of age, and had received ≥1 add-on Anti Epileptic Drug (AED) within 60 days of first-line treatment. Patients were grouped into: Well-controlled (no change in AED and no epilepsy-related Emergency Room (ER) or inpatient visits), Uncontrolled (≥2 AED changes in ≥30 days and ≥1 Epilepsy-Related ER or inpatient visits), and Intermediate-controlled (not grouped as Uncontrolled or Well-controlled). The groups were matched based on propensity scoring in a 1:1:1 ratio including age, sex, and Charlson comorbidities index score. A mixed-effects model was used to calculate the adjusted cost differences. 

Results: From 141,173 patients, 6,785 triads were included in the analysis. Mean age was 48±16.6 years (62% female). Uncontrolled patients had significantly higher direct costs: Uncontrolled vs. Well-controlled: $32,077; Uncontrolled vs. Intermediate-controlled: $14,855. Indirect costs were: Uncontrolled vs. Well-controlled: $5,016; Uncontrolled vs. Intermediate-controlled: $2,750. Differences were due to hospitalization costs (Uncontrolled/ Well-controlled: $15,297; Uncontrolled/Intermediated-controlled: $9,123), outpatient visits (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled: $9,248; Uncontrolled/Intermediated-controlled: $4,534), AED costs (Uncontrolled/Well-controlled: $4,546; Uncontrolled/ Intermediate-controlled: $3,079), sick leave costs (Uncontrolled/ Well -controlled:  $4,849; Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled: $2,577), and total work loss (Uncontrolled/ Well-controlled: Uncontrolled/Intermediate-controlled : $2,750) $5,016;  (all p<0.01).Adjusted costs were significantly higher for Intermediate-control vs. Well-controlled patients for all cost items (all p<0.01), with the exception of non-AED costs and disability, which were not significantly different. 

Conclusions: In this study, direct and indirect costs were highest for uncontrolled, and lowest for well-controlled epilepsy. These findings suggest the importance of improvements in control of seizure activity (either from uncontrolled to intermediate-controlled, or  from intermediate-controlled to well-controlled), both from a societal cost and public health perspective. 

 

Download PDF
Fulton Velez (2014), Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Uncontrolled Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study in a Commercially-Insured U.S. Population. Neurol Res Ther Open Access 1:106
Copyright: Copyright: © 2014 NRTOA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, Version 3.0, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Indexed In
Google Scholar
DOAJ
PubMed
Scopus